Face Shape Lens

Face Shape Detector: Compare Methods, Free Access and Exports

Choose a face shape detector by its disclosed method, accepted photo format and result access—not by a confidence score alone; this comparison records what six official tool pages disclose and leaves undocumented limits unresolved.

Download the comparison table (CSV)

Collected 2026-09-22 (UTC). This is a dated audit of official pages, not a test of detection accuracy. No portraits were submitted, quotas exhausted or result files exported. “Not stated” means not found on the linked page during this visit; it does not mean the feature is absent. Camera and upload controls were inspected without activating a camera. The listed processing methods and privacy descriptions are provider claims, not code-audit findings.

Official-page comparison — 2026-09-22 (UTC)
ToolDetection methodInputOutputLoginFree allowanceAccuracy claimExportOther limits
AltFTool official page
2026-09-22 (UTC)
68 landmarks; face-api.js and geometric ratio thresholdsImage file or drag-and-drop; extensions not stated; webcam explicitly excludedShape, confidence figure and proportion readoutsNo account required (stated)Free; no usage limit (stated)Calls it a measured estimate; no validated accuracy percentage statedNot statedFile-size and resolution limits not stated
KnowYourFaceShape official page
2026-09-22 (UTC)
MediaPipe; 478 landmarks; proportion matchingCamera or file; JPG, PNG, WebP, HEICShape, measurements, ratios and confidenceNo account required (stated)Free; numerical usage allowance not statedExplicitly declines to publish an independently unverifiable accuracy percentageNot statedFile-size, resolution and daily limits not stated
Symmi official page
2026-09-22 (UTC)
478 landmarks; widths, face length and jaw angle compared with shape rangesFile, drag-and-drop or paste; JPG, PNG, WebPShape breakdown and measurement ratiosNot stated; upload control visible without signing inFree; numerical usage allowance not statedDescribes measurement-based results; validated accuracy percentage not statedNot statedFile-size, resolution and daily limits not stated
Style Look Lab official page
2026-09-22 (UTC)
MediaPipe plus proprietary classifier and normalized 36-point contourPhoto file; extensions not statedClosest two of seven labels, with checks and supporting measurementsNo sign-up (stated)Free; numerical usage allowance not statedExplicitly says its internal rules have not been independently validatedNot statedFile-size, resolution and daily limits not stated
Facial Recognition official page
2026-09-22 (UTC)
68 landmarks; ratio distances; estimated hairline-to-chin lengthFile or drag-and-drop; JPG, PNG, WebP recommendedShape percentage breakdown and ratiosNo account required (stated)Free; as many photos as desired (stated)Claims greater consistency than mirror judgement; no validated accuracy percentage statedNot statedLargest face analysed in a group photo (stated); file-size and resolution limits not stated
DetectMyFaceShape official page
2026-09-22 (UTC)
MediaPipe; 478 landmarks; ratios scored against shape profilesCamera, file or drag-and-drop; JPG, PNG, WebPShape, confidence score, measurements and styling tipsNo sign-up (stated)Free; no usage limit (stated)Uses accuracy and precision language; no validated accuracy percentage statedDownloadable result card stated; file extension not statedFile-size and resolution limits not stated

What this comparison lets you distinguish

AltFTool, Facial Recognition and DetectMyFaceShape explicitly allow unrestricted repeat use in the pages checked. KnowYourFaceShape, Symmi and Style Look Lab describe free access but do not specify a numerical allowance there. Free access and an explicit promise of unlimited use therefore occupy different cells in this record.

KnowYourFaceShape lists HEIC beside its photo input. Symmi, Facial Recognition and DetectMyFaceShape name JPG, PNG and WebP. AltFTool and Style Look Lab do not enumerate extensions in the inspected text. That is a documentation difference, not proof that an unlisted format will fail.

DetectMyFaceShape advertises a downloadable result card. The inspected page does not identify its extension. The remaining inspected pages do not specify an export format. A result shown in a browser is not evidence of a PDF, CSV or image export; this comparison file is our own downloadable research table, not an export produced by those detectors.

Do not rank these tools by their displayed percentages

KnowYourFaceShape declines to publish an unverifiable accuracy percentage, while Style Look Lab says its internal rules have not been independently validated. AltFTool calls its result an estimate. These statements disclose limits; they do not establish which tool makes fewer classification errors.

Facial Recognition describes percentage scores derived from distances to shape ratios. DetectMyFaceShape calls its result a confidence score. Neither description supplies a shared evaluation protocol that would let this audit compare their percentages as accuracy measurements. We have therefore recorded the claim, rather than inventing a performance ranking.

The landmark counts in the table identify the methods described by their providers. They are not successful-test counts. More landmarks alone cannot establish a winner from this evidence. This audit contains no labelled test set and makes no accuracy calculation.

A file you can revisit, not a permanent specification

Keep the source URL and collection date attached to any row you reuse. If a provider changes its upload screen, allowance or export option, update that field from the new page and retain the earlier observation separately. Do not silently replace an unknown limit with a guessed value.

For a workflow that requires a particular file format or a saved report, an unresolved cell is a reason to check that requirement before relying on the tool. The useful next question is precise: does this page accept the file I have, and does its actual result offer the output I need? The current record answers only what the official pages disclose.

Dated source record

Each line below refers to the linked official page observed on the stated collection date. Specifications are reported claims, not measured performance.

What remains unverified

Actual file decoding, successful detection, accuracy, server-side image handling, enforced quotas and exported file types were not tested. We do not turn undocumented fields into “no,” and we do not claim this is the only comparison on the English-language web.